Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government of Kazakhstan Airline
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SpinningSpark 12:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Government of Kazakhstan Airline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article, thus failing notability. Jetstreamer Talk 19:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete government operated aircraft is not really an airline and not really notable enough for a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley 18:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator....William 23:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – MilborneOne makes a good point that government-operated aircraft are not really enough to make an airline. And without any assertion of coverage in any source, it fails the notability test. —Compdude123 18:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.