Skip to main content

Make sense of it all

Our world has too much noise and too little context. Vox helps you understand what matters. We don’t drown you in panic-inducing headlines, and we’re not obsessed with being the first to break the news. We’re focused on being helpful to you.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

Elon Musk promised Wisconsin voters a $1 million reward. Is that legal?

Here’s what election law experts say.

President Trump Attends NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship In Philadelphia
President Trump Attends NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship In Philadelphia
President Donald Trump and White House senior adviser Elon Musk shake hands while attending the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship on March 22, 2025, in Philadelphia.
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images
Nicole Narea
Nicole Narea covers politics Vox. She first joined Vox in 2019, and her work has also appeared in Politico, Washington Monthly, and the New Republic.

For the second time in a year, Elon Musk appears to be trying to bribe voters — and election law experts say it’s probably illegal.

Musk offered Thursday to “personally hand over” a total of $2 million to two individuals who have already voted in the closely watched Wisconsin Supreme Court race. (It’s unclear whether the payment is conditional on voting for Musk’s preferred candidate.)

Following threats of potential legal blowback, however, he said that the recipients of the $1 million reward would instead be chosen on the basis of their ability to be effective spokespeople for a petition against “activist judges.” His PAC has also offered $100 to anyone who signs the petition.

Musk’s spending has already made the supreme court race the most expensive in Wisconsin history.

The stakes are high: The election will determine the court’s ideological balance — and potentially the future of abortion rights, electoral maps, and unions in the critical battleground state.

It’s the second time in two years that control of the court has been up for grabs. It’s also the second time that Musk has promised cash rewards to voters, and last time, he didn’t face any repercussions. Here’s what we know.

When was the last time Musk tried something like this?

In 2024, Musk’s PAC orchestrated a $1 million daily giveaway to registered voters in battleground states. The PAC initially said the recipients would be selected randomly in a lottery that the Philadelphia district attorney argued was a violation of state election law. Election law experts also argued that it violated federal law prohibiting cash payments for registering to vote or casting a ballot, including as part of a lottery.

The PAC later claimed that recipients were selected not via lottery, but based on whether they could be effective spokespeople for the PAC, which ultimately spent more than $200 million to help elect Trump. That was enough to satisfy a Pennsylvania judge, who allowed that giveaway to go ahead, but the scheme spurred further lawsuits that are still ongoing.

So, are Musk’s payments legal?

In a blog post Friday, election law expert Rick Hasen, a professor at UCLA Law, said probably not. He pointed to Wisconsin state law, which states that paying voters to turn out is a crime. There is also a federal prohibition on vote-buying, but that doesn’t kick in when there are no federal candidates on the ballot, and it’s not clear that Trump’s Department of Justice would even prosecute Musk if it could, Hasen wrote.

Still, it’s alarming that the richest man in the world could be trying to buy votes in a highly contested and consequential election — and that at least one state court has already greenlighted a similar scheme before. Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler said in a statement Friday, “Musk can have his day in court, but he cannot buy the court.”

More in Politics

How the Nintendo Switch 2 delay explains Trump’s tariffsHow the Nintendo Switch 2 delay explains Trump’s tariffs
Culture

Trump threw a blue shell at Nintendo — and the global economy.

By Nicole Narea
A conspiracy theorist convinced Trump to fire the NSA directorA conspiracy theorist convinced Trump to fire the NSA director
The Logoff

Laura Loomer, a 9/11 truther, apparently gets input into the president’s national security decisions.

By Patrick Reis
What this disastrous week taught us about the Trump presidencyWhat this disastrous week taught us about the Trump presidency
Politics

The true nature of America’s crisis has been revealed.

By Zack Beauchamp
The right is cooking up a surprising legal fight against Trump’s tariffsThe right is cooking up a surprising legal fight against Trump’s tariffs
Supreme Court

At least some GOP legal elites are lining up against Trump’s trade policy. That could be enough to sway the justices.

By Ian Millhiser
How Trump’s tariffs could help ChinaHow Trump’s tariffs could help China
Podcast
Today, Explained podcast

“You couldn’t have drafted these conditions better if you were a Chinese diplomat.”

By Noel King and Gabrielle Berbey
You have questions about Trump’s tariffs. We have answers.You have questions about Trump’s tariffs. We have answers.
Politics

And also more questions.

By Nicole Narea