Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pakistani heads of state or government
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Merge proposals may take place in the appropriate venue. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Pakistani heads of state or government (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We already have List of Presidents of Pakistan and List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan. I see little purpose behind having this list. Seems redundant. Mar4d (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I see a huge difference between a state's head or executive and a president or a prime minister. Especially like a country like Pakistan, such lists are essential as chief exececutive keeps changing all the way. It may be a dictator, president or a prime minister. Therefore, the concerned article is eligible. Faizan 02:05, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but Merge in the other two lists. This is an omnibus list that includes the people on the other lists but with the addition, for example, of Governor-Generals. Therefore deletion is not the way to go because it would lose essential information. OTOH because of the overlaps having three lists is messy and inefficient. Best, I think, to put all the lists together in one. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I do not see any valid reasons for removal except technical problems with links. Fix it. My very best wishes (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.