User talk:Spokeoino

Redirects are placed for a reason and you are not allowed to remove them without WP:CONSENSUS

Please; go get some WP:CONSENSUS before removing redirects that are placed. ♥ Melody ♥ 09:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

You get this Consensus by going to the article talk page and discussing the removal of the redirect. ♥ Melody ♥ 09:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

It looks like another editor redirected this page elsewhere because the person in the article is not Notable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ali_Niknam&oldid=1276379150

♥ Melody ♥ 09:09, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

{{adminhelp}} I have read the Notability guidelines [Wikipedia:Notability] and the person's page was in line with those guidelines, can you assist? Spokeoino (talk) 12:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Please read the Notability guidelines [Wikipedia:Notability]

Nomination of Ali Niknam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Niknam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Niknam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 13:03, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

@Caeciliusinhorto-public The article was speedy deleted, there wasn't a discussion, unfortunately Spokeoino (talk) 07:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. If this block is based off of private evidence, it can additionally be appealed to the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

331dot (talk) 11:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.